PEM electrolysis, short for proton exchange membrane electrolysis, splits water into hydrogen and oxygen using a semipermeable membrane, usually made from an ionomer such as the fluoropolymer Nafion, that conducts protons across it while blocking both a direct electronic pathway and the reactants themselves from passing straight through. Because it generally relies on expensive platinum group metal catalysts, a PEM electrolyzer costs more to build than other electrolyzer types, but it also runs more efficiently and can operate at higher current densities. Average working efficiency for PEM electrolysis today is around 80 percent, with efficiency expected to rise to between 82 and 86 percent before 2030 and a theoretical ceiling estimated as high as 94 percent.
Facts
Partially Attested
Invented YearThe source states only that PEM electrolysis was first introduced in the 1960s by General Electric. 1960 is recorded as a representative year within that decade pending a more precise founding date. Classification
MaturityTRL 7: System Prototype Demonstration in Operational Environment 1 Technology TypeWater electrolysis using a solid polymer proton exchange membrane electrolyte 1 Sources
1. Wikipedia: Proton exchange membrane electrolysis
Lead section
Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis is the electrolysis of water in a cell equipped with a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) that is responsible for the conduction of protons, separation of product gases, and electrical insulation of the electrodes.
History section
The use of a PEM for electrolysis was first introduced in the 1960s by General Electric, developed to overcome the drawbacks to the alkaline electrolysis technology.
In Group: Water Electrolysis, Lead
Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis is the electrolysis of water in a cell equipped with a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) that is responsible for the conduction of protons, separation of product gases, and electrical insulation of the electrodes.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.