Methane pyrolysis produces hydrogen from natural gas without releasing carbon dioxide, most practically by bubbling methane through a molten metal catalyst in a single step process, a method demonstrated in laboratory conditions in 2017 and now being tested at larger scale. The reaction, methane splitting into solid carbon and two hydrogen molecules, proceeds at a high temperature around 1,065 degrees Celsius and needs about 18 kilowatt hours of electricity for process heat to produce each kilogram of hydrogen. Rather than carbon dioxide, methane pyrolysis yields solid carbon as its byproduct, which can be sold as a manufacturing feedstock, mixed into asphalt paving, or simply landfilled, and hydrogen produced this way, without greenhouse gas emissions, is known as turquoise hydrogen. As of 2023 methane pyrolysis technology remained in early development at several companies, with real obstacles still to clear before it reaches commercial scale.
Facts
Technology TypeA hydrogen production process that splits methane into hydrogen gas and solid carbon using heat alone, without combustion and without a carbon dioxide byproduct. 1 Invented YearMarks Monolith Materials own first pilot-scale demonstration plant in Redwood City, California; the underlying molten-metal-catalyst reaction had been studied at laboratory scale before this pilot. Classification
MaturityTRL 3: Experimental Proof of Concept 1 Sources
1. Wikipedia: Pyrolysis
WikipediaPyrolysis article, Uses section, turquoise hydrogen paragraph
In 2015, a company called Monolith Materials built a pilot plant in Redwood City, CA to study scaling Methane Pyrolysis using renewable power in the process.
Technology maturity, entity description (description property itself uncited on this atlas; cited against the entity's own live or freshly minted Wikipedia source instead)
As of 2023 methane pyrolysis technology remained in early development at several companies, with real obstacles still to clear before it reaches commercial scale.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.