Energy Atlas

How The World Is Powered
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Technology

Colliding Beam Fusion

Fusion Device

Colliding beam fusion, or a colliding beam fusion reactor, is a class of fusion power concepts based on two or more intersecting beams of fusion fuel ions that are independently accelerated to fusion-relevant energies using particle accelerator designs or other similar means, rather than being heated together as a single bulk plasma. The approach traces back to direct-acceleration fusion techniques explored from the 1930s onward, and its technical variants include the inertial electrostatic confinement designs Fusor and Polywell as well as devices such as Migma and the Tri-Alpha Energy design later commercialized as TAE Technologies. A persistent obstacle across colliding beam designs is the ionization drag problem, in which the accelerated ion beams lose energy to collisions with the background plasma faster than they can be replenished, which is a major reason none of the colliding beam approaches has yet achieved net energy gain or commercial viability.

Facts
Classification
Maturity
TRL 3: Experimental Proof of Concept 1
Technology Type
Fusion power concept 1
Connections

Uses Source

Source Wikipedia: Colliding beam fusion
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Colliding beam fusion
  • Intro, sentence 1
    is a class of fusion power concepts
  • Uses Source: Nuclear Fusion, Wikipedia article lead
    beam fusion reactor (CBFR), is a class of fusion power concepts that are based on two or more intersecting beams of fusion fuel ions
  • In Group: Electrostatic and Other Fusion Concepts, Lead
    Colliding beam fusion (CBF), or colliding beam fusion reactor (CBFR), is a class of fusion power concepts that are based on two or more intersecting beams of fusion fuel ions that are independently accelerated to fusion energies using a variety of particle accelerator designs or other means.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.