The Proalcool Program was launched by the Brazilian government in 1975 in response to the 1973 oil crisis, as a national initiative to substitute imported oil with ethanol fuel distilled from domestically grown sugarcane. The program combined production subsidies for ethanol distilleries, guaranteed purchase prices, and mandates encouraging automakers to build ethanol-only and, later, flexible-fuel vehicles capable of running on any blend of ethanol and gasoline. Although the program's direct government subsidies were scaled back and largely ended by the late 1990s after a period of ethanol shortages had dented public confidence, it left Brazil with an enduring sugarcane ethanol industry and a vehicle fleet built around flex-fuel technology that continues to shape the country's transport fuel market. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Project TypeNational Energy Initiative 1 StatusThe original federal subsidy program wound down by the late 1990s, but the ethanol and flex-fuel vehicle market it created remains a permanent feature of Brazil's fuel supply 2 ScaleBuilt Brazil into the world's largest ethanol fuel market at the time and enabled tens of millions of ethanol-capable vehicles 2 Connections
Uses Source
1975 Brazilian national program to replace petroleum-based fuels with sugarcane ethanol.
In the Other Atlases
- Also in Geography Atlas: Brazil, located there.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Ethanol fuel in Brazil
Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel_in_BrazilQuote, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel_in_Brazil
The National Alcohol Program -Pró-Álcool- (Portuguese: Programa Nacional do Álcool), launched in 1975, was a nationwide program financed by the government to phase out automobile fuels derived from fossil fuels, such as gasoline, in favor of ethanol produced from sugar cane.
View the Source 2. Encyclopedia Britannica
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.